N. Lygeros
4.
There are correlations between the concept of intelligence and those of
culture, thought and discovery when those are extreme.
4.1
If the intelligence quotient is higher than 150, we note a correlation between
intelligence and culture. As if starting from this value the individual were to
use an enriched intellectual substrate.
4.1.1 The verbal tests, not limited in time, are effective to measure this
correlation.
4.1.2
These tests giving access to encyclopaedic knowledge, their cultural aspects or
the projection of the mental activity of their creators cannot in no case to be
negative. Because in this manner, the apparently cultural difficulty is
transformed into a heuristic difficulty.
4.2
If the intelligence quotient is higher than 160, we note a correlation between
intelligence and thought. As if starting from this value the individual could
carry out face : speed of the intelligence and power of the thought.
4.2.1
The space and numerical tests, not limited in time, are effective to measure
this correlation.
4.2.2
Intelligence and thought are different: one is innate and fluid, the other is
acquired and crystallized.
4.2.3
We can learn how to think, not to be intelligent.
4.2.4
The fast tests measure the simple intelligence and the tests not limited in
time measure the complex thought.
4.2.5
The intelligence is a raw material that the thought structures.
4.2.6
The thought is the language of the intelligence.
4.3
If the intelligence quotient is higher than 176, we note a correlation between
intelligence and discovery. As if starting from this value the individual
tested the need for using his intelligence to discover.
4.3.1
Only the extreme tests have the capacity to measure this correlation.
4.3.2
The spirit of synthesis generates the need for creation.
4.3.3
The discovery is the finality of the intelligence.
