N. Lygeros
Translated from the Greek by Athena
Kehagias
As
easy as it is for a cultured person to comprehend dyssynchrony, which is
associated with the charismatic phenomenon, it is as hard, for that same
person, to realize the extreme effect that, the extreme intelligence represents
within the same environment. For instance, for someone to capture the time
difference between gifted children is, so to say, the classic work of the
psychometrist and of every person who is confronted with this issue. Because
the difference is noticeable, even if it’s not analyzed so well, in order to be
understood. On the other hand it's easier to understand the difference between
one's mental age and chronological age, from that which is deeper and is
associated with charismatic dyssynchrony of the first phase of the
M-classification. However, what is the age of people in the second phase? How
could someone grasp the difference that characterizes them?
In
fact, through the extreme result, we observe a horizon phenomenon.As if, beyond
a certain point, the normal person is no longer able to understand another's
identity. In order for his mind to identify somebody, it's trying to build a
cognitive model of the other, which allows him to communicate. And this model
is, so to say, perfect, and as it regards the vast normal majority it's
applicable to everyone. However, when it's applied to a person emotionally
different, this model collapses and with it, each effort of basic
communication. Because thereon, the person that is asking is not able to
understand the answers. The system is out of balance. As if one asks a man to
stand upright on the ocean.
A
first attempt to understand this reality requires not the use of a linear
model, but a parallel machine. This notion is useful for two reasons. Firstly,
it’s associated with a particular entity in computing and thereon is more
applicable in order to understand the cognition of a person who is regarded as
abnormal. The parallelism owes its success to the implementation of a minimum
mixed strategy. All of the components are functioning simultaneously similar
obligations and contribute to the final result. If the calculation was applied
to linear time, it would be larger than the product of time of each processor. Also,
the parallel machine does not live within the same period. Involving this idea
in a neuronic machine, we have the approach of a coherent model. And at this
time it is difficult for calculations to be allocated, therefore it is
difficult to know which formal neurons where involved in the processing. The
calculation obtains a holistic notion, and in this new context it is even more
difficult to estimate the corresponding linear time.
The
second attempt, which complements the first, regards the memory. At present,
our model is structured without invoking the memory, even if a neuronic machine
functions through learning. The person of the second phase is not just an
idiomorphic feature in the cognitive time, but has a dynamic role that derives
from links which were woven through memory and its cultivation. It is not an
element or a unit of knowledge, it represents a general element and it's for
this reason that it becomes universal. It is not just the culmination of ideas
from the past.
In the second phase, is the memory of the future of humanity, a future trapped
in the past for the others. Within it, exists a kind of expansion of time,
which makes it , no greater, nor inferior, just incomparable. So, when someone
asks a parallel machine, one neuronal machine, a being like a chameleon for its
age, they should not be surprised by the answer, because it has a real meaning,
when they understand that teleology is it's ontology. A chameleon is not a thousand
years old, but lives for a thousand years.
